0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹ÌÃëÇоƵ¿ÀÇ À¯Ä¡¿ì½Ä°æÇèµµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿ªÇÐÀû¿¬±¸ ¥±

Epidenuologycal study ¥± on dental caries incidences of primary teeth of non-school students

ÁøÁÖ°£È£º¸°ÇÀü¹®´ëÇÐ³í¹®Áý 1999³â 22±Ç 1È£ p.33 ~ 52
KMID : 0647819990220010033
½Å¼±Çà (  ) - ÁøÁÖº¸°Ç´ëÇÐ Ä¡À§»ý°ú

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹ÌÃëÇоƵ¿µéÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½Ä°æÇèµµ¸¦ Á¶»ç ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ¿µÀ¯¾Æ±¸°­º¸°ÇÀÇ ¹æÇâ¼³Á¤°ú ½ÇÁ¦ ¿µÀ¯¾Æ±¸°­º¸°Ç ±³À°´ã´çÀÚµéÀÇ ½Ç¹«¿¡ µµ¿òÀ» Áִµ¥ ±âÃÊÀڷḦ Á¦½ÃÇÒ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î 1998³â 12¿ù 20ÀϺÎÅÍ 12¿ù 27ÀϱîÁö ÁøÁֽó»¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ÀϺξÀÌÁý À§Å¹»ý 130¸í(³²¾Æ: 78¸í, ¿©¾ß: 52¸í)À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Ä¡¾Æ¿ì½Ä¹ß»ýºóµµ¸¦ Á¶»çÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. À¯Ä¡¿ì½Ä°æÇèÀ²Àº ³²¾Æ 61.2%, ¿©¾Æ 38.8%, ÃÑ 79.2%·Î ³²¾Æ¿¡°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
2. ¿ì½Ä°æÇèÀ¯Ä¡À² ¹× Áö¼ö´Â 0.92¡¾0.31%, 0.03¡¾0.03°³ À̾ú°í ¿ì½Ä°æÇèÀ¯Ä¡¸éÀ² ¹× Áö¼ö´Â 0.75¡¾0.04%, 4.87¡¾4.27¸éÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
3. óÁöÀ¯Ä¡À²Àº ¿¬·É¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â°í, ³²¾Æ 7.70¡¾10.76%, ¿©¾Æ 8.17¡¾11.99%, ÃÑ 7.98¡¾11.22%·Î ¿©¾Æ¿¡¼­ ¾à°£ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
4. dft rate´Â 0.86¡¾ 0.25, 0.98 ¡¾0.34% ·Î education groupº¸´Ù non-education group¿¡¼­ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ª, µÎ ±×·ì°£¿¡ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. (p £¼ 0.01)
5. ft rate´Â 8.63¡¾11.31%, 7.19¡¾11.18%·Î education groupÀÌ non-education groupº¸´Ù ¾à°£ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÁö¸¸ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.

The purpose of this study is to present basic data for the direction establishment of infant- child dental health and job of its educator by surveying epidemiologically on the dental caries prevalence. The researcher recruited 130 non-school students(baby seater home)(Male : 78, Female : 52) who live in chinju city from Dec 20 to Dec 27, 1998 using dental caries survey form.
The results were as follows.

1. The prevalence of dental caries was 61.2% in male, 38.8% in female, and 79.2% in both sexes.
2. ditrate & ditindex were 0.920.31%, 0.030.03 teeth. dfsrate & df sindex were 0.750.04%, 4.874.27 surface.
3. ftrate was 7.7010.76% in male, 8.1711.99% in female, and 7.8911.2256 in both sexes.
4. dit rate was 0.860.25% in education group, 0,980.34% in non-education group. It was statistically significant(p < 0.01).
5. ft rate was 8.6311.31% in education group, 7.1911.18% in non-education group. It was higher in education group than in non-education group, but was statistically not significant.

KeyWords

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸